USPTO serial 87553978
GUADALUPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHIANG, TIFFANY YOUNG
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GUADALUPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan G. Morton
246 WEST BROADWAYNew York, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery; Essential oils for personal use; Cosmetics and make-up; Eye make-up; Eyeliners; Blushers; Lipsticks; Hair lotions; Non-medicated soaps for hands, face and body | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather; trunks and suitcases; travelling cases of leather; handbags; purses; wallets; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; whips; harnesses; saddlery | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Divans; sofas; armchairs; beds; ottomans; tables; chairs; chaise lounges; furniture; mirrors; picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HDH TEXTILES AND MANUFACTURERS (PTY) LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named GUADALUPE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 3, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |