USPTO serial 87554010
NO BILL IS SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROOKSHIRE, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NO BILL IS SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Oliner
ELIZABETH OLINER OLINER LAW345 GROVE STREET, 2ND FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for bill negotiation, namely, software that analyses a user's bills; Computer software for analyzing a user's bills; Downloadable mobile applications for compiling all bills and debts of the user; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for communicating with various vendors for the purpose of negotiating bills; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for compiling a list of view local bill negotiation services providers and enables the user to contact these services providers; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for enabling users to communicate with various vendors for the purpose of negotiating bills, and which compiles a list of view local bill negotiation services providers and enables the user to contact these services providers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring resources, namely, non-downloadable software for enabling users to communicate with various vendors for the purpose of negotiating bills for the purpose of lowering the user's bills; Providing a website featuring resources, namely, non-downloadable software for communicating with various vendors for the purpose of negotiating bills, and which compiles a list of local bill negotiation services providers and enables the user to contact these services providers for the purpose of lowering the user's monthly bills; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use analyzing a user's bills; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for enabling users to consolidate monthly bills and communicate with third party vendors for use in debt negotiation; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for enabling users to communicate with various vendors for the purpose of negotiating bills; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for compiling a list of local bill negotiation services providers and enables the user to contact these services providers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Keen Group Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Keen Group Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NO BILL IS SAFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |