Drawing for MILKSAFE

USPTO serial 87554325

MILKSAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILKSAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shanti Hubbard

SHANTI HUBBARD CHAN HUBBARD PLLC115 BroadwayWeWork--5th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for providing online, mobile and digital health information for consumers and patients including tracking, collecting and analyzing consumer and patient data; Computer software for providing digital health information for consumers and patients including tracking, collecting and analyzing consumer and patient data; Computer application software for mobile phones and mobile devices for assisting in the identification, diagnosis and management of consumer and patient health; Computer software for wireless data communication for receiving, processing, transmitting and displaying information relating to healthACTIVE—
010Medical diagnostic devices for monitoring breast milk and formula milk quality and their accompanying software sold as a unit; Medical diagnostic breast milk and formula milk testing apparatus and accompanying software sold as a unit; health monitoring device consisting of sensors that test and diagnose breast milk and formula milk contaminant, toxin and nutritional qualityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 27, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance