USPTO serial 87554371
AMERICAN VINTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMERICAN VINTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver R. Chernin
OLIVER R. CHERNIN MCLAUGHLIN & STERN, LLP260 MADISON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | 3D decorative ornaments made from plastic; Accent pillows; Armchairs; Armoires; Baby changing tables; Bamboo curtains; Bar carts; Bassinets; Bath pillows; Bathroom furniture; Beach chairs; Bean bag beds; Bean bag chairs; Bean bag pillows; Bed bases; Bed frames; Bed headboards; Bed pillows; Bedroom furniture; Beds; Benches; Book stands; Bookcases; Bookshelves; Bottle racks; Box springs; Bulletin boards; Bunk beds; Cabinets; Chairs; Chaise lounges; Chests of drawers; Closet accessories, namely, belt racks; Closet accessories, namely, clothes bars; Closet accessories, namely, shoe racks; Closet accessories, namely, sliding clothes rails; Clothes hangers; Coat racks; Computer furniture; Computer keyboard trays; Console tables; Cots; Couches; Credenzas; Cribs; Cupboards; Curtain rods, rollers and hooks; Cushions; Custom furniture; Deck chairs; Decorative 3D pillows and cushions; Desks; Dining chairs; Dining room tables; Divans; Dog beds; Dressing tables; Easy chairs; Entertainment centers; Fitted fabric furniture covers; Fitted furniture covers not of fabric; Floor pillows; Folding beds; Foot stools; Furniture; Futons; Gun cabinets; Hand-held mirrors; Hat racks; High chairs; Indoor window blinds being shades; Infant beds; Infant walkers; Inflatable furniture; Interior window coverings, namely, vertical and horizontal louvers; Internal venetian blinds; Kitchen cabinets; Lawn furniture; Lounge chairs; Magazine racks; Massage tables; Mattresses; Medicine cabinets; Metal furniture; Mirror frames; Mirrors; Neck-supporting pillows; Night tables; Nightstands; Novelty pillows; Office furniture; Ottomans; Outdoor furniture; Pet furniture; Piano benches; Picture frames; Pillows; Plastic bins; Plastic containers, namely, tubs for consumer products packaging; Playpens; Plush figures for use as outdoor holiday decorations; Recliners; Rocking chairs; Seat cushions; Serving trolleys; Shoe racks; Shower curtain hooks; Shower curtain rings; Shower curtain rods; Sink mats; Sofa beds; Sofas; Stools; Storage racks; Surfboard display rack; Table tops; Tables; Tea carts; Three dimensional decorative ornaments made from plastic; Three dimensional ornaments made from plastic; Tie racks; Towel racks; Toy boxes; Umbrella stands; Upholstered furniture; Venetian blinds; Wardrobes; Waterbeds; Wax figurines; Wind chimes; Interior window shades; Wine racks; Wood chopping block tables; Work benches; Writing desks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |