USPTO serial 87555469
LUXURY DAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUXURY DAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kari L. Barnes
KARI L. BARNES BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION18400 VON KARMAN AVE., 8TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and commercial information services, via the internet; advertising and directory services, namely, promoting the services of others by providing a web page featuring links to the websites of others; advertising and marketing services provided by means of indirect methods of marketing communications, namely, social media, search engine marketing, inquiry marketing, internet marketing, mobile marketing, blogging and other forms of passive, sharable or viral communications channels; advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; advertising and marketing; marketing, advertising, and promoting the retail goods and services of others through wireless electronic devices; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a web site featuring coupons, rebates, price-comparison information, product reviews, links to the retail web sites of others, and discount information; advertising and promoting the sale of luxury goods and services; retail jewelry stores; retail gift shops; retail furniture stores; retail clothing stores; retail apparel stores; retail department stores; retail store services featuring clothing, jewelry, shoes, wearable accessories, electronics, appliances, automobiles, motor vehicles, kitchenware, dinnerware, sporting goods, real estate, eye glasses, eye wear, motorcycles, cigars, airplanes, transportation vehicles, traveling goods, leather goods, boats, hotels, wines, liquors, beer, food, alcoholic beverages; on-line retail jewelry stores; on-line retail gift shops; on-line retail furniture stores; on-line retail clothing stores; on-line retail apparel stores; on-line retail department stores; on-line retail store services featuring clothing, jewelry, shoes, wearable accessories, electronics, appliances, automobiles, motor vehicles, kitchenware, dinnerware, sporting goods, real estate, eye glasses, eye wear, motorcycles, cigars, airplanes, transportation vehicles, traveling goods, leather goods, boats, hotels, wines, liquors, beer, food, alcoholic beverages; retail store services and online retail store services featuring a wide array of consumer goods of others; retail store services and online retail store services featuring luxury goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUCCESSFULMATCH.COM, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SUCCESSFULMATCH.COM, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named LUXURY DAY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 29, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |