Drawing for AI CHALLENGER

USPTO serial 87556863

AI CHALLENGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AI CHALLENGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Zhi Dong

Zhi Dong Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C.45 South Seventh Street, Suite 2700Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; Commercial information agency services; Conducting Market studies; Business research; Organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; Organization of trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; Commercial intermediation services; Providing business information via a web site; Marketing services; Provision of an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and servicesACTIVE—
036Financial services, namely, investment management services, financial planning services, mutual fund investment services and securities brokerage services; Financial management; Financial analysis; Financial consultancy; Financial information; Providing financial information via a web site; Capital investment; Rental of offices (real estate); Investment of funds; Stocks and bonds brokerageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2021EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 10, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 8, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 2, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 11, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 11, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 23, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 16, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 14, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 11, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance