Drawing for NAÙ

USPTO serial 87558138

NAÙ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORAN, CAROLINE L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAÙ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa S. Dillenbeck

MELISSA S. DILLENBECK DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP191 NORTH WACKER DRIVESUITE 3700CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Processed cereals and cereal-based snack foods; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, coffee-based beverages; corn-based snack foodsACTIVE—
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, water-based beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 25, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 12, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 12, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 30, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 3, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance