Drawing for RGJ

USPTO serial 87558699

RGJ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RGJ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sharon K. Brad

SHARON K. BRADY MCKELLAR IP LAW, PLLC784 S. POSEYVILLE RD,MIDLAND, MI 48640UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for use in asssoication with injection molding manufacturingACTIVE—
041Training services in the field of injection molding manufacturingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 30, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 29, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance