USPTO serial 87561335
FLOE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 2020
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FLOE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Day
Christopher J. Day DAY LAW FIRM9977 NORTH 90TH STREET SUITE 155SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Eyeglass frames; Eyeglass lenses; Eyeglasses; Eyewear; Spectacle cases; Spectacle frames; Spectacle lenses; Spectacles; Sunglass lenses; Sunglasses; Cases for eyeglasses and sunglasses | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2016 |
| 044 | Eyeglass fitting; Fitting of contact lenses; Optician services; Optometry services; Treatment of eye diseases and conditions | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |