Drawing for VARICHROME

USPTO serial 87562550

VARICHROME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JONES, JACQUELYN ANDREA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VARICHROME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin Keener

KEVIN KEENER KEENER AND ASSOCIATES PC161 NORTH CLARK STREET SUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Plastic holders in the nature of sleeves specifically adapted for holding and protecting collectible trading cardsACTIVE—
028Plastic protective sleeves for gaming cards; Plastic holders in the nature of sleeves specifically adapted for holding and protecting game cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 6, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 6, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 26, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 31, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 7, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 7, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 7, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance