Drawing for XPLORE

USPTO serial 87562666

XPLORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XPLORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTONY J. MCSHANE

ANTONY J. MCSHANE NEAL GERBER & EISENBERG LLP2 NORTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038transmission and distribution of data and digital images of the Earth and the solar system via a global computer network or the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 21, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 14, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 8, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 10, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 10, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 11, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 9, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 13, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 13, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 13, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 13, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance