Drawing for QYCK

USPTO serial 87562949

QYCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEGGS, MONICA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QYCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua A. Schaul

JOSHUA A. SCHAUL SHERMAN IP LLP1519 26TH STREETSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for arranging and coordinating transportation and delivery servicesACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in electronically storing and managing digital currencyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 20, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 20, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 25, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 25, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance