USPTO serial 87564615
BURMA BITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BURMA BITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia R. Adwere
CYNTHIA R. ADWERE LAW OFFICE OF CYNTHIA R. ADWERE2625 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD #360PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | pre-cooked curry stew; packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; tea leaf salads in the nature of vegetable salads; lotus chips in the nature of vegetable chips; frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; processed nut and seed snack mix; prepared nut and seed mix for topping salads; vegetable salads, namely, fermented tea leaf salads also containing processed nuts and beans; fermented tea leaves; pre-packaged salad kit, consisting primarily of fermented tea leaves, processed nuts and processed beans; pre-packaged vegetable salad; soups; fried split pea snacks; salad topping kit consisting primarily of processed nuts and seeds; tea leaf snack bars consisting primarily of fermented tea leaf, processed nuts and processed beans; snack bars made primarily of fermented tea leaves and also including granola | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | coconut rice, namely, cooked rice prepared with coconut milk; salad dressing; tea based snacks in the nature of tea leaf snack bars; tea leaf-based snack foods, namely, tea leaf clusters; ginger tea; tea-based beverages; tea; iced tea; sandwiches; sauces; savory sauces used as condiments | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; ginger ale; ginger beer; ginger lemonade; tea drinks, namely, non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; beer; fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | concessions stands featuring food in the nature of food stalls at farmer's markets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Burma Eats Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BURMA BITES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |