Drawing for HINDSIGHT

USPTO serial 87564872

HINDSIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELMAN, JESSE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HINDSIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlene D. Hanks

Arlene D. Hanks MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC100 North Tryon StreetSuite 4700Charlotte, NC 28202-4003

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail and on-line grocery store services featuring home delivery serviceACTIVE—
039Laundry pick-up and delivery services; shipping and delivery services, namely, pickup, transportation, and delivery of packages and letters by various modes of transportationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 1, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 16, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 16, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance