Drawing for CPX PAYMENTS GATEWAY

USPTO serial 87568143

CPX PAYMENTS GATEWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CPX PAYMENTS GATEWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pam P Smith

PAM P SMITH BALCH & BINGHAM LLP1901 SIXTH AVE N, SUITE 1500BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Payment processing services, namely, payment processing services in the field of credit card, debit card, automated clearing house (ACH), electronic check conversion, blockchain, and other forms of electronic payments provided via an online platform services marketed to businesses to facilitate electronic business-to-business paymentsACTIVE—
042Platform as a service services featuring computer software platforms to facilitate electronic business-to-business paymentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 20, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance