Drawing for AUSSIE BITES

USPTO serial 87568698

AUSSIE BITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUSSIE BITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott H Davison

SCOTT H DAVISON MUSICK DAVISON LLP12636 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE SUITE 400SAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Foodstuffs for dogsACTIVEOct 25, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 17, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 6, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 6, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 6, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 6, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 6, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance