Drawing for THINK SMARTER

USPTO serial 87569057

THINK SMARTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THINK SMARTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD J MCKENNA

RICHARD J MCKENNA FOLEY & LARDNER LLP777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for connecting, operating, and managing networked football helmets, cattle, drones, and medical refrigeration appliances in the internet of things (IoT); data mining, namely, performing analytics and data analysis on information collected via internet of things (IoT) sensorsABANDONEDApr 15, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2021MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 19, 2021ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 19, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 19, 2021OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 28, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2020WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2020WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 30, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance