Drawing for EL ESTADIO MAS GRANDE DEL MUNDO

USPTO serial 87569894

EL ESTADIO MAS GRANDE DEL MUNDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GALBO, AMANDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EL ESTADIO MAS GRANDE DEL MUNDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Everett E. Fruehling

EVERETT E. FRUEHLING CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, telecommunication access services, wireless telephone services; communication services for the electronic transmission of voices, namely, electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, transmission of voice by means of broadband power line or wireless networks; transmission of data, namely, electronic transmission of data, transmission of data signals, wireless electronic transmission of data, transmission of data by satellite; electronic transmission of images, photographs, graphic images and illustrations over a global computer network; electronic transmission of data, audio, video and multimedia files; simulcasting broadcast television over global communication networks, the Internet and wireless networks; provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via an online video-on-demand service; satellite communication services; telecommunications gateway servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 30, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 19, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 21, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 21, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance