USPTO serial 87570912
MDM CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MDM CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Petruzzi
JAMES D. PETRUZZI THE PETRUZZI LAW FIRM4900 WOODWAY DR., STE 745HOUSTON, TX 77056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Computer software for enterprise resource planning (ERP), product and customer information management; financial management, financial control and reporting, supplier relationship management (SRM), catalog management, spare parts management, procurement and settlement management, supplier contract management, enterprise services automation, digital data management, project portfolio management (PPM), project analytics, project costing, billing, supply chain management (SCM), customer order management, inventory and fulfillment management; computer software and programs, in the form of computer software discs and online web-based and cloud-based software, for use in connection with business operations and general office functions | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 2011 |
| 042 | Preparation, development and design of computer programs and software for use in business operations and general office functions; Computer services; namely, consultation in the field of computer software; programming, design, development, analysis, implementation, installation, management, integration, deployment and updating of computer software for others; dissemination, leasing and rental of computer software; leasing access to a full line of non-downloadable computer software and cloud based software; hosting of computer software for others; technical support services for computer software, namely, problem troubleshooting; repair, leasing, updating, outsourcing and maintenance of computer programs and software; editing and provision of data and information on the Internet regarding the development, preparation, programming, production, execution, distribution, sale, marketing, application use, operating mode, handling, modification, repair, leasing, updating, design and outsourcing of computer programs and software | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |