USPTO serial 87571750
CONNECT+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONNECT+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas W. Gilmore
DOUGLAS W. GILMORE SLATER MATSIL, LLP17950 PRESTON RD STE 1000DALLAS, TX 75252UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Systems for IoT secured access; computer application software for use in controlling IoT security locks and IoT security alarms | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | IoT security floodlights, spotlights, and wall lights | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice and data in the field of IoT security; telecommunication services, namely, providing electronic message alerts relating to IoT security; transmitting audio and video data relating to IoT security events; streaming audio and video data relating to IoT security events; electronic transmission and streaming of digital audio/video content via computer networks and computer application software relating to IoT security events | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing IoT security surveillance of residential and commercial premises; home and business IoT security alarm monitoring; monitoring of IoT alarms and security systems; IoT alarm surveillance services; providing IoT security surveillance of premises for homeowners and businesses; providing information in the field of IoT security; home and business safety consulting in the fields of crime and security; emergency response alarm monitoring services, namely, monitoring of alert devices by a remote monitoring center for dispatching emergency security services, and notification of third parties; consulting in the field of IoT home and business security; security threat analysis for protecting personal safety; IoT security monitoring using sensors, cameras, and motion detectors; alarm response and verification services; monitoring IoT security alarms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chanbonpin, James
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CONNECT+
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |