USPTO serial 87573912
ANGELICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANGELICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan G. Morton
Jonathan G. Morton Morton & Associates, LLP246 WEST BROADWAYNew York, NY 10013Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2020 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |