USPTO serial 87574336
ORBITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2019
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with ORBITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Andrew Mazza
Mark Andrew Mazza Dentons Cohen & Grigsby P.C.625 LIBERTY AVENUEPITTSBURGH, PA 15222United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Construction project management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Environmental services, namely, technical consultation in the field of environmental services with respect to safety and inspection; safety auditing to improve the safety of construction workers on construction sites | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Regulatory safety compliance consulting in the fields of fall protection systems, process safety management, arc flash studies and engineered safety systems; safety consulting services in the fields of hazard assessment and abatement procedures; inspection of manufacturing plant structures and equipment for safety purposes, namely inspection of structural, mechanical and electrical assets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Orbital Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Orbital Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Orbital Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ORBITAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |