USPTO serial 87582772
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Foster City, CA
Foster City, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney LEE & HAYES, PC601 WEST RIVERSIDE, SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for enabling mobility as a service by providing a platform that coordinates mobility options; Computer application software for configuring robots to provide mobility and transportation services; Computer software for coordinating transportation services, namely, software for electronic message alerts featuring leads, optimal matches, and matching posts for services, scheduling, namely, connecting transportation providers with individuals and groups needing rides, the arrangement and booking of transportation, electronic messages, social networking services and profiles; Computer software for coordinating transportation services, namely, software for the automated scheduling and dispatch of motorized vehicles; Computer application software for mobile and wireless devices connecting drivers and passengers; Computer application software for mobile and wireless devices, namely, software for automated scheduling and dispatch of motor vehicles; Mobile application software for coordinating transportation services; Computer application software for mobile and wireless devices, namely, software for engaging transportation services; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices, namely, software for remote control of electronic devices; Electronic devices in the nature of transportation control systems for unmanned transportation units; Electronic components for unmanned transportation units, namely, connectors and interconnectors for computers and computer hardware, computer network interface devices and computer interface boards, electronic display interfaces, and electronic communication systems comprised of computer hardware and software to enable signaling, switching and control of electronic components for aerial robotics and power management, data management, downlink transmission control, and interactions with other unmanned vehicles, all for mobility robotics and parts and fittings therefor; Navigation apparatus for vehicles; Electronic vehicle tracking apparatus; Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; Electronic instruments for detecting traffic | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land transportation and mobility vehicles; Land vehicles and conveyances in the nature of automobiles; Self-driving transport vehicles; Unmanned conveying land vehicles; Passenger carrying vehicles; Electric vehicles; Driverless cars; Mobility conveyances namely, automated people movers in the nature of multi-passenger wheeled robotic vehicles; Mobility vehicles, namely, passenger shuttles in the nature of land vehicles; Industrial vehicles, namely, semi-trailer trucks; Passenger motor vehicles, namely, land vehicles; Unmanned vehicles, namely, land vehicles; Transportation robots, namely, robotic transport vehicles; Structural parts for all of the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transport by land; Transportation of passengers by motorized vehicle; Transportation of goods by motorized vehicle; Transportation of passengers by vehicle through a network of transportation providers; Transportation of goods by vehicle through a network of transportation providers; Providing customized driving directions | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |