USPTO serial 87583097
FELECIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GALBO, AMANDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FELECIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; make-up; eye make-up; eyeliners; blushers; lipsticks; hair lotions; non-medicated soaps | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather sold in bulk; leather, namely, leather cases, leather laces; trunks and suitcases; travelling cases; handbags; purses; wallets; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; whips; harness; saddlery | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Divans; sofas; armchairs; beds; ottomans; tables; chairs; chaises longues; furniture; mirrors; picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HDH TEXTILES AND MANUFACTURERS (PTY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named FELECIA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |