USPTO serial 87583832
ARAMARK FLEXFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON II, COLLIER L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARAMARK FLEXFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Camille M. Miller
CAMILLE M MILLER COZEN O'CONNORONE LIBERTY PLACE STE 28001650 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Uniforms; wearing apparel, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, jackets, coats, caps being headwear, hats, socks, panty hose, coveralls, overalls, rainwear, underwear, gloves, sweaters, laboratory coats, smocks, belts, suspenders, aprons, vests, sweatshirts, visors being headwear, t-shirts, face-warming masks, scarves, skirts, dresses, sports coats, ties, all used as uniforms; performance apparel, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, jackets, coats, caps being headwear, hats, socks, panty hose, coveralls, overalls, rainwear, underwear, gloves, sweaters, laboratory coats, smocks, belts, suspenders, aprons, vests, sweatshirts, visors being headwear, t-shirts, face-warming masks, scarves, skirts, dresses, sports coats, ties, all used as uniforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 13, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 13, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |