USPTO serial 87584704
AEROGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2021
- Examiner
- MARTINS, ODETTE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AEROGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina S. Loza
Christina S. Loza LOZA & LOZA LLP305 N SECOND AVE127UPLAND, CA 91786Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software and hardware for the development and operation of robotic devices, drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes, unmanned aerial systems (UAS) for drone detection and neutralization for security purposes, and remote control (RC) aircraft as a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes; accessories for robotic devices, drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aerial systems (UAS), and remote control (RC) aircraft as components of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes, namely, batteries, battery chargers, remote controls, power supply adaptors, wireless signal range extenders, electronic device for controlling flight, and electronic device for video display in the nature of desktop-mounted video displays, rack-mounted video displays, head-mounted video displays, heads-up video displays, and portable video displays; downloadable manuals for the operation and maintenance of robotic devices, drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aerial systems (UAS), and remote control aircraft; electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and system for drone detection and neutralization for security purposes for robotic devices, drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aerial systems (UAS), and remote control (RC) aircraft comprised of GPS navigational devices, remote controls, radio transmitters and receivers, computer hardware and operating software; data processing apparatus cameras as a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes; electric batteries as a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes; altimeters as a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes; antennas and aerials as a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes; scientific angle measurement devices as a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes, namely, azimuth measuring instruments; flight controlling apparatus as a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes being remote controls for operating drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aerial systems (UAS), and remote control (RC) aircraft; automatic flight control and autopilot systems as a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes comprising computer hardware and software for controlling the flight of unmanned aerial systems (UAS), drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); accelerometers and gyros for use in navigation and guidance systems as a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes; counter-drone system for security purposes comprised of proximity sensors, electronic controllers for drones, and electronic devices for locating drones using radio frequency, optical, thermal, and human observation; drone countermeasures systems for security purposes, namely, radio transmitters for use as radio frequency jamming devices, high powered electronic microwave transmitters and radio frequency (RF) transmitters capable of disrupting radio receivers and other electronic devices in the nature of radio receivers, radio transmitters, and radar apparatuses | ACTIVE | May 15, 2019 |
| 012 | Drones, namely, drones which are a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), namely, UAVs which are a component of a drone detection and neutralization system for security purposes | ACTIVE | May 15, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sanmina Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Sanmina Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Sanmina Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named AEROGUARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 31, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |