Drawing for EARIS

USPTO serial 87584763

EARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JONES, JACQUELYN ANDREA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tawnya Wojciechowski

TAWNYA WOJCIECHOWSKI TRW LAW GROUP19900 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD, SUITE 1150IRVINE, CA 92612-8433UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for organizing, maintaining and accessing electronic data and information relating to the operations of hearing aid businesses and their suppliers, retailers, patients and doctors; Computer software for back office operations of businesses, namely, for collaborators and employee management of usernames, passwords, and roles, clinic management, management of hearing aid pricing and applicable discounts, patient management, audiogram creation, appointment management, purchasing and invoicing, credit card processing, inventory management, business metrics and reports, accounting, marketing, patient communication, telehealth and document storage; Downloadable computer software for organizing, maintaining and accessing electronic data and information relating to the operations of hearing aid businesses and their suppliers, retailers, patients and doctorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 28, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 28, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 30, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 30, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance