Drawing for STRIKEZON

USPTO serial 87585887

STRIKEZON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRIKEZON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yoon S. Ham

YOON S HAM HAUPTMAN HAM LLP2318 MILL RD STE 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Baseball simulators, namely, electronic sports training simulators in the field of baseball, comprised of computer hardware, computer software, video projection screen, vision sensors, and electronic control kiosks, all the foregoing for playing screen baseballACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 8, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2019CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 31, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 28, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 28, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 10, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 16, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 3, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance