Drawing for HUCK STRUCTURAL Q-LOK

USPTO serial 87585974

HUCK STRUCTURAL Q-LOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUCK STRUCTURAL Q-LOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller

SUSAN L HELLER GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP18565 JAMBOREE ROADSUITE 500IRVINE, CA 92612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal rivetsACTIVEMar 31, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 26, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 13, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 19, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2019CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 30, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 30, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 10, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 10, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2019CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 8, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 12, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 16, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance