USPTO serial 87586143
MAMA SAID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALAO, OREOLUWA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAMA SAID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Zimmermann
MARK J. ZIMMERMANN DEALEY, ZIMMERMANN, BLEND & GRAY, PC3300 OAK LAWN AVESUITE 403DALLAS, TX 75219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | mechanical and luminous signs; decorative magnets | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2014 |
| 014 | rubber bracelets; key chains | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2013 |
| 016 | banners of paper; printed paper signs; specify Class 16 type, e.g., merchandise, paper lunch bags; printed menus; pens; pencils; murals consisting of signs painted on the wall; catering supplies consisting of specify Class 16 goods, e.g., paper table linens; coasters of paper | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2005 |
| 021 | cups; mugs; lunch bags not of paper; insulating sleeve holders for beverage cans replacing "koozie"; catering supplies consisting of specify Class 21 goods, e.g., serving trays and spoons, beverage glassware, etc.; coasters not of paper or textile | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2017 |
| 025 | shirts; caps being headwear | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tonan II, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MAMA SAID
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |