Drawing for MIRCOFIN

USPTO serial 87586204

MIRCOFIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOPKINS, SARAH COLLEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MIRCOFIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Demarco

JOHN DEMARCO YOUNG BASILE HANLON & MACFARLANE P.C.3001 W. BIG BEAVER ROADSUITE 624TROY, MI 48084

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Household deodorizers; household deodorants; gauze for dressings; eyepatches for medical purposes; ear bandages; menstruation bandages; menstruation tampons; sanitary napkins; sanitary panties; sticking plasters for medical use; bandages for dressings; antiseptic liquid bandages; breast-nursing pads; napkins in the nature of babies' diapers; adult diapers; disposable baby diapers; diapers for incontinence; infant diaper coversACTIVE—
025Evening dresses; school uniforms; children's wear, namely, shirts, skirts, shorts, dresses and pants; liveries; clothing, namely, jackets; jogging pants; sweatpants; suits; skirts; trousers; smocks; formal wear, namely, tuxedos and dinner jackets; coats; raincoats; cardigans; sweaters; vests; shirts; nightgowns; negligees; nightwear; pajamas; bathrobes; disposable underwear; underwear; undershirts; underpants; slips; panties; brassieres; petticoats; sash bands for kimono (obi); bustle holder bands for obi (obiage); undershirts for kimonos (koshimaki); undershirts for kimonos (juban); full-length kimonos (nagagi); short overcoat for kimono (haori); string fasteners for haori (haori-himo); pleated skirts for formal kimonos(hakama); sleep masks; aprons; socks; stockings; headgear for wear, namely, hats and caps; garters; sock suspenders; suspenders; waistbands; clothing, namely, belts; footwear; insoles; masquerade costumes; clothing for sports, namely, jerseys, shorts, and uniforms; ski suits for competition; clothing, namely, headbands; uniforms; clothing, namely, wristbands; wet suits; shoes; sports shoes; gymnastic shoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2017TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Nov 21, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance