USPTO serial 87586817
VISA ID INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERLIN, JUSTIN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISA ID INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise Yee
Denise Yee VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION900 METRO CENTER BOULEVARDFOSTER CITY, CA 94404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Broad based financial services, namely, banking, bill payment services, credit card payment processing services, debit card payment processing services, charge card payment processing services, pre-paid card payment processing services, processing electronic credit and debit transactions, electronic funds transfer, smart cards and electronic cash payment processing services, cash disbursement, cash replacement rendered by credit cards and debit cards, electronic cash transactions, deposit access and automated teller machine services, payment processing services, processing of financial transactions online via a global computer network or via telecommunication, mobile or wireless devices, transaction authentication and verification services, dissemination of financial information and electronic payment data via a global computer network or via telecommunication, mobile or wireless devices; financial advisory services in relation to authentication services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Authentication services, namely, providing user authentication services using document conversion and matching software and hardware technology, biometric hardware and software technology, user data validation, and device data validation for e-commerce transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing user authentication services in e-commerce transactions; Providing user authentication of electronic funds transfer, credit and debit card and electronic check transactions via a global computer network; Identification verification services, verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information via secure storage and transmitting such information via the Internet, SMS, and other communications networks; verifying and authenticating the identification information and credentials of users of websites and software applications for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Visa International Service Association
- Other trademarks owned by Visa International Service Association
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named VISA ID INTELLIGENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |