Drawing for B-MAX

USPTO serial 87587776

B-MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B-MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sharon C. Sorkin

Sharon C. Sorkin Ford Global Technologies, LLC330 Town Center DriveSuite 800, Fairlane Plaza SouthDearborn, MI 48126

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012land motor vehicles, namely, automobiles and their engines; exterior insignia badges for vehicles; vehicle rooftop carriers, namely, roof racks; fitted motor vehicle covers; bug deflectors in the nature of bug shields for motor vehicles; mud flaps for motor vehicles; trailer hitch covers for motor vehicles; automobile windshield sunshades and license plate frames for motor vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2019CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 21, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2019EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 23, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 26, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 21, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 11, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 24, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance