USPTO serial 87588123
DLG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DLG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Forfar, Angus, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie A. Greenberg
JULIE A. GREENBERG DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP900 WILSHIRE DRIVE SUITE 300TROY, MI 48084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | Yarns and threads; spun threads; synthetic fiber thread; synthetic fiber yarn; synthetic thread and yarn; semi-synthetic fiber thread and yarn; yarns and threads for textile use; yarns made of synthetic material for textile use; plastic thread for textile use; textile yarns made of man-made fibers; yarn of synthetic or mixed fibers for use in textiles; synthetic fiber yarn and thread for use in the production of artificial turf, artificial grass and artificial ground coverings; synthetic yarn and thread for use in the production of floor coverings and artificial ground coverings being sheet material | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Artificial ground coverings; floor coverings and artificial ground coverings; artificial turf; artificial turf for laying on the surfaces of recreational areas; artificial lawn; imitation turf for use in covering surfaces for games; imitation turf for use in covering surfaces for athletics; imitation turf for use in covering surfaces for recreational purposes; imitation turf for use in covering surfaces for sports purposes; imitation turf for laying on the surfaces of recreational areas; artificial grass; floor coverings being sheet materials for use in sporting activities; artificial turf and artificial lawn for use in relation to landscaping purposes; artificial ground coverings for domestic use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |