USPTO serial 87589091
NOUVEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOUVEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio speakers; Bags for cameras and photographic equipment; Battery charge devices; Camera cases; Camera filters; Camera flashes; Camera shutters; Cameras; Cases adapted for cameras; Cell phone cases; Cell phone covers; Computer cables; Computer carrying cases; Computer hardware and computer peripheral devices; Computer mice; Electronic game software for wireless devices; External computer hard drives; Headphones; Keyboards; Lenses for cameras; Loud speakers; Mobile phone straps; Mobile phones; Multifunction keyboards; Protective covers for smartphones; Speaker enclosures; Virtual reality game software; Wireless computer peripherals; Wireless headsets for smartphones; Wireless transmitters and receivers | ACTIVE | Aug 21, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 17, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2019 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |