Drawing for FREUND MA DO

USPTO serial 87590401

FREUND MA DO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FREUND MA DO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE 10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Suction and vacuum machines for industrial use; degreasing machines for use in meat processing; meat processing machines, namely, fat removal machines; electric knives; power saw blades; power-operated saws; band saws; chain saws; circular saws; electric shears; cutting machines; crushing machines for industrial purposes; grinders; sharpening machines; power-operated meat grinders; electrical apparatus for mixing liquids; meat cutting machines; electric meat knives; power-operated cutters for meat processing; meat processing machinesABANDONED—
008Apparatus and equipment for stunning livestock, namely, electric cattle prods; apparatus and equipment for de-hiding and skinning slaughter livestock, namely, hand-operated scraper, hand-operated knife, hand-operated pliers, a hand-operated tool having a blade and hook to assist in skinning an animal; knives; saw blades for hand saws; hand saws; scissors; shears; apparatus and equipment for slaughtering livestock, namely, hand-operated scraper, hand-operated knife, hand-operated pliers, a hand-operated tool having a blade and hook to assist in skinning an animalABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 26, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 26, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 26, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 5, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 6, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance