USPTO serial 87591424
REDACTED CYBER EXECUTIVE PROTECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDACTED CYBER EXECUTIVE PROTECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander J.A. Garcia
ALEXANDER J.A. GARCIA PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and hardware for performing security, threat, and risk-management assessments, analyses, and investigations; computer software, namely, software for management of security breach incidents and responses; computer software, namely, software for the protection of digital assets from cyber warfare, computer hacking, and computer viruses; computer software, namely, software to monitor and collect systems and network data; computer hardware, namely, hardware to monitor and collect systems and network data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing and hosting a secure electronic online platform and website featuring software that allows cyber surveillance to assist in providing defense against data breaches and privacy violations; computer security consultancy in the fields of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for security information services and customized computer security that provides real-time analysis of security alerts generated by network hardware and software; computer security consultancy; computer software testing to identify security vulnerability; computer forensic services; computer security consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases; computer network security services and communications network security services in the nature of network intrusion protection testing, computer testing for vulnerability management and assessment, risk management and assessment, data breach threat analysis, and network threat analysis; computer and network incident response and forensics and penetration testing; computer security consulting services in the field of critical incident response to information, computer, and internet security breaches; computer security consulting services intended to identify, pursue, and deter threat actors; computer security services for protecting data and information from unauthorized access, namely, accessing, scanning, and monitoring of reports, the Internet, public records, and computer activity and accounts to facilitate the detection and prevention of data breaches, identity theft, and fraud; computer security services for protecting data and information, namely, providing monitoring of customer computer systems against unauthorized access; consulting services in the field of data breach, identity theft, and fraud risk-management and assessment services, fraud detection, and data breach response, namely, data breach threat assessment and simulation, data breach vulnerability analysis and mitigation, and data breach emergency response; consulting services in the field of security data breach threat assessment, namely, consulting services intended to identify, pursue, and deter data breach threat actors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Redacted, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Redacted, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REDACTED CYBER EXECUTIVE PROTECTION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |