USPTO serial 87598020
SMART.CASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WLODARCZYK, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMART.CASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
5083 Grödig/Salzburg, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal E. Friedman
NEAL E. FRIEDMAN DAVIS & BUJOLD, P.L.L.C.112 PLEASANT STREETCONCORD, NH 03301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Point of Sale (POS) - Computer systems; automatic devices and machines for the sale and issue of tickets, charge cards, data carriers coded with access privileges, and access privileges; electronic payment terminals for the acquisition of access privileges for persons and vehicles and for encoding access privileges for persons and vehicles on data carriers; self-service POS systems for the acquisition of access privileges for persons and vehicles; sales terminals for the acquisition of access privileges for persons and vehicles; sales terminals for encoding access privileges for persons and vehicles on data carriers; credit card-operated and debit card-operated terminals for the acquisition of access privileges for persons and vehicles; terminals for the acquisition of access privileges for persons and vehicles, equipped with card readers, RFID readers, RFID read/write devices, keyboards, printers, touch screens, speakers, displays and/or internet connections; payment machines for the payment of parking charges; electrical or electronic information terminals and/or advertising terminals; checkout terminals and POS systems for self-operated registration of goods or registration of services and payment for goods or payment for services; electrical or electronic apparatus for the redemption and collection of data carriers coded with access privileges and for repaying a deposit; software and apps for the use, management, administration, operation, monitoring and control of the above mentioned goods; digital signage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |