USPTO serial 87599198
VIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hui Zhang
HUI ZHANG RABIN & BERDO, PC1101 14TH STREET, N.W., SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services; On-line advertising on a computer network; Provision of space on websites for advertising goods and services; Organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; Providing business information via a website; Sales promotion for others; Import-export agency services; Provision of an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; Compilation of information into computer databases; Systemization of information into computer databases; Arranging subscriptions to telecommunication services for others; Updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; Compiling indexes of information for commercial or advertising purposes; Wholesale and retail store services featuring mobile phones, smartphones and related accessories and parts; On-line wholesale and retail store services featuring mobile phones, smartphones and related accessories and parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |