Drawing for VIVO

USPTO serial 87599249

VIVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hui Zhang

HUI ZHANG RABIN & BERDO, PC1101 14TH STREET, N.W., SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Design and development of multimedia products; Technical research in the field of mobile phone software development; Technical research in the field of telecommunications; Technical research in the field of the fifth generation technology; Technical research in the field of artificial intelligence; Technical research in the field of photography; Industrial design services; Design of mobile telephones; Packaging design; Computer software design; Computer programming; Updating of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Computer system design services; Installation of computer software; Recovery of computer data; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in database management; Off-site data backup; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials; Unlocking of mobile phones; Data encryption services; Developing of driver and operating system softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 10, 2019ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 9, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance