USPTO serial 87599519
EYEBRIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EYEBRIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Ramey III
William P. Ramey III RAMEY & SCHWALLER, LLP5020 MONTROSE BLVD.STE. 800HOUSTON, TX 77006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Correcting contact and eyeglass lenses; spectacles; eyeglasses; contact lenses; containers for contact lenses; sunglasses; spectacle lenses; eyeglass lenses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eyebright Medical Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Eyebright Medical Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EYEBRIGHT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 4, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |