Drawing for ELECTRIC JELLYFISH

USPTO serial 87603131

ELECTRIC JELLYFISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELECTRIC JELLYFISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. Michael Drumm

H MICHAEL DRUMM DRUMM LAW LLC14656 W 56TH DRARVADA, CO 80002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerACTIVEOct 25, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 3, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 3, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 19, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 24, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 9, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 27, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 18, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 18, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 2, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 2, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance