Drawing for THE DIFFERENCE IS IN THE DETAILS

USPTO serial 87604172

THE DIFFERENCE IS IN THE DETAILS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE DIFFERENCE IS IN THE DETAILS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Oliner

ELIZABETH OLINER Zaffré1820 Swarthmore Ave #41Lakewood, NJ 08701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Body deodorants; Body lotions; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cologne; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Cosmetics; Deodorant for personal use; Deodorants for body care; Deodorants for human beings; Foot deodorant spray; Fragrances; Hair care preparations; Hair rinses; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hand creams; Hand lotions; Lip balm; Perfumes; Perfumes and colognes; Personal deodorants; Shampoo-conditioners; Shaving cream; Shaving preparations; Skin creams; Skin lotions; Skin moisturizer; Sunscreen creams; Sunscreen preparations; Wrinkle resistant cream; Anti-wrinkle creams; Non-medicated lip care preparations; Non-medicated skin care preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance