Drawing for DELIVERY DOCTOR

USPTO serial 87604560

DELIVERY DOCTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELIVERY DOCTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas J. McEvoy

Douglas J. McEvoy DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP900 WILSHIRE DRIVE SUITE 300TROY, MI 48084UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medical services, namely, development of individual treatment plans for individuals related to preconception, prenatal, perinatal and postnatal health care; medical services, namely, monitoring medical treatment plans for individual preconception, prenatal, perinatal and postnatal care, excluding actual delivery of babiesACTIVE—
045Case management services, namely, coordinating enrollment services into treatment programs for tracking preconception, prenatal, perinatal and postnatal health and wellness, excluding treatment during deliveryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 17, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 17, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 2, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance