USPTO serial 87604922
HALCYON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HALCYON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel S. Polley
DANIEL S POLLEY DANIEL S POLLEY PA7251 WEST PALMETTO PARK ROADSUITE 202BOCA RATON, FL 33433Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Diving, snorkeling, scuba and underwater activities equipment, namely, tanks, fins, hoses, wetsuits, dry suits, heater packs, wraps, regulators, gauges, buoyancy wings, buoyancy compensators, back plates, lift devices, life rafts, weight release systems, weight systems, lift bags, rebreathers, alert markers, lights, underwater lights, battery packs, light heads, valves, personal flotation devices, wraps, pockets, dry suit inflation kits, bottle rigging kits, knives, clips, snaps, gear bags, hose units, buckles, tank bands, storage pockets, harness pads, harnesses, manifold, snorkels, masks, flippers, weight belts, lift devices, surface markers, reels and spools for guidelines, electronic displays, wet notes, underwater paper, underwater pencils, underwater pens, diver's notebook, notebook, diver propulsion vehicles, gloves, booties, hoods, mask accessories, dive flags, device chargers and parts therefore; (Based on Intent to Use) dive computers | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |