USPTO serial 87605034
NIU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Johanne Muzzo
JOHANNE MUZZO GUY & MUZZO INC.6455 CHRISTOPHE-COLOMB206MONTREAL, H2S2G5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Wipes impregnated with teeth cleaning preparations; non-medicated mouth rinse; non-medicated breath fresheners and mouth wash; teeth whitening kit; teeth whitening preparations; teeth whitener preparations; teeth whitening toothpaste; cosmetic teeth whitening strips impregnated with teeth whitening preparations; teeth stain remover, namely, teeth whitening preparations; teeth whitening strips, namely, cosmetic teeth whitening strips impregnated with teeth whitening preparations; toothpaste; dental whitening gel; dental rinses for non-medical purposes; dental whitening foam; dental strips, namely, cosmetic teeth whitening strips impregnated with teeth whitening preparations; dental bleaching gel; teeth cleaning lotions; tooth cleaning preparations; non-medicated breath fresheners; breath freshening sprays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |