USPTO serial 87605451
MAMA'S BOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAMA'S BOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grace R. Neibaron
GRACE R NEIBARON NEIBARON LAW235 FOSS CREEK CIRCLEHEALDSBURG, CA 95448UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | tinctures for medicinal purposes; tinctures derived in part, from hemp for medicinal purposes; topical analgesic creams for medicinal purposes, topical analgesic creams derived in part, from hemp for medicinal purposes; dietary and nutritional supplements, namely, capsules, oral sprays, and oral chews all of the foregoing derived in part, from hemp; dietary and nutritional supplements; chocolates, and candies for medicinal purposes all of the foregoing derived in part, from hemp; chocolates, and candies for medicinal purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | T-shirts; Graphic T-shirts; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; polo shirts; Hoodies; Sweatshirts; Baseball caps and hats; Sweat pants; and socks | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of hemp extract used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; Cartridges sold filled with hemp extract for electronic cigarettes; electronic cigarette cartridges, electronic cigarettes; electronic cigarettes filled in part with hemp extract; all the foregoing derived from industrial hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; rolling papers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |