CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KLUE

USPTO serial 87605716

KLUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEETE, KYLE C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KLUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew Colagrosso

710 Medtronic Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55IP LegalMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55432

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in detecting, analyzing and storing information regarding body movements, physical activities and physical locations, and predicting behavior based thereon for health and medical purposes computer software for use in electronic communications, reminders and interventions based on anticipated behavior patterns for health and medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 6, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2023TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 7, 2023OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 7, 2023OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 25, 2023OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 15, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 19, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 1, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 1, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 28, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 6, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 6, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 6, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance