Drawing for FLASH FACIAL

USPTO serial 87609180

FLASH FACIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLASH FACIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pejman Yedidsion

PEJMAN YEDIDSION BROOKS ACORDIA IP LAW PC11601 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDFIFTH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90025

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skin care preparationsACTIVEJun 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 21, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 27, 2019EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Jun 20, 2019RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 20, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 9, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 30, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 14, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 14, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 14, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance