USPTO serial 87610568
ECOSOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOSOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol M Wilhelm
CAROL M WILHELM GRAY REED & MCGRAW LLP1300 POST OAK BLVD.SUITE 2000HOUSTON, TX 77056Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Environmentally friendly comprehensive engine component detergent for industrial use, engine component nanocoating chemical wash solution for industrial use, and complete engine chemical wash solution for industrial use designed for application to aero, aeroderivative and marine gas turbine engines and components to improve antifouling and to provide enhanced fuel efficiency and low emissions | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Cleaning, application of protective coatings and washing of aero, aeroderivative and marine gas turbine engine components to improve surface quality; application of protective nano coatings; and turbine engine washing to improve antifouling and to provide enhanced fuel efficiency and low emissions; all of the above performed in an environmentally friendly manner | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |